Etos

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: Netherlands

Etos sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

1 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Etos is owned by Ahold Delhaize.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions to wastewater, ingredients' impacts, product circularity, and more. Here we rate Etos “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses some lower-impact ingredients including certified organic ingredients, but it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of ingredients used.
  • It’s set a science-based target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in both its direct operations and supply chain but there’s no evidence it is on track.
  • It has no policy to evaluate the biodegradability and environmental toxicity of its ingredients.
  • Most of its palm oil is RSPO-certified.
  • Some of its product packaging is recyclable.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assesses brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Etos “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • Much of its final stage is located in lower-risk countries or certified facilities, however it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of suppliers.
  • There’s no evidence it provides financial security to its suppliers, which can result in poor working conditions and wages.
  • Its Code of Conduct covers ILO Four Fundamental Freedoms principles.
  • It audits some of its suppliers but does not specify what proportion.
  • It provides a confidential complaints mechanism for workers in its supply chain to report suspected modern slavery.
  • There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.

Note that the "People" rating in Good On You’s methodology is defined by labour rights and does not consider consumer health.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products, are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Etos “Very Poor”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses animal-derived ingredients in its products.
  • It appears to use ingredients derived from farmed animals, including lanolin.
  • It may conduct animal testing when required by law (for instance, in China), either by itself, through its suppliers, or through third parties.

Based on all the publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Etos “Not Good Enough” overall.

Last updated 2026-10-07