Kingsley Heath

Rated: Not good enough

Last rated: Sep 2023

price:
$$$$

location: South Africa

Kingsley Heath does not communicate sufficient information about its environmental and labour policies.

Kingsley Heath sustainability rating

This brand was last rated September 2023. The assessment is likely outdated.
Suggest a rating update

Planet

2 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Unfortunately, Kingsley Heath does not publish sufficient information. You have a right to know how the products you buy affect the issues you care about.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Kingsley Heath “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Kingsley Heath “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.
  • It appears to use leather, wool, and down.
  • It doesn’t appear to use fur, angora, exotic animal skin, or exotic animal hair.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Kingsley Heath “Not Good Enough” overall.

Rated Sep 2023

Brands often evolve their sustainability practices and disclosures. This rating is based on publicly available information at the time of rating.