NARS

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: France

NARS sustainability rating

Planet

3 out of 5

People

3 out of 5

Animals

1 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


NARS is owned by Shiseido.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions to wastewater, ingredients' impacts, product circularity, and more. Here we rate NARS “It's a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • There’s no evidence it uses any lower-impact ingredients.
  • It recycles product packaging, but does not disclose the amount or other details.
  • It’s set a science-based target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in both its direct operations and supply chain but there’s no evidence it is on track.
  • A high proportion of its palm oil is certified by RSPO.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assesses brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate NARS “It's a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • Much of its final stage is located in lower-risk countries or certified facilities.
  • There’s no evidence it provides financial security to its suppliers, which can result in poor working conditions and wages.
  • Its Code of Conduct covers ILO Four Fundamental Freedoms principles.
  • It has an internal grievance mechanism for workers in its supply chain to anonymously report concerns like harassment and unpaid wages.
  • The brand claims to audit some of its supply chain but doesn’t specify what percentage.
  • It ensures some workers in the final production stage are paid living wages, though not through its entire supply chain.

Note that the "People" rating in Good On You’s methodology is defined by labour rights and does not consider consumer health.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products, are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate NARS “Very Poor”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses animal-derived ingredients in its products.
  • It appears to use ingredients derived from farmed animals, including lanolin and collagen.
  • It has not made any public commitments to eliminate animal-derived ingredients.
  • It may conduct animal testing when required by law (for instance, in China), either by itself, through its suppliers, or through third parties.

Based on all the publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate NARS “Not Good Enough” overall.

Last updated 2025-11-21