ESP

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate ESP “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It uses few lower-impact materials, and it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of materials used.
• There’s no evidence it takes action to minimise its packaging, which is a driver of plastic waste.
• It manufactures its products closer to home to reduce the climate impact of long-distance shipping.
• To minimise waste, its products are made to order.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate ESP “Good”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• Its products are made in-house by the owner.
• There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate ESP “It's a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It appears to use wool and cashmere.
• Some of its animal-derived materials consist of recycled alternatives to conventional cashmere.
• It doesn’t appear to use leather, shearling, alpaca, mohair, down, angora, fur, exotic animal hair, or exotic animal skin.
• There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate ESP “It's a Start” overall.