Titania Inglis

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Titania Inglis “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It uses some lower-impact materials, however it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of materials used.
• There’s no evidence it takes action to minimise its packaging, which is a driver of plastic waste.
• It manufactures its products closer to home to reduce the climate impact of long-distance shipping.
• There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce water use. 

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Titania Inglis “It's a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• All of its final production stage happens in the United States of America.
• It partly traces its supply chain, including the final and some of the second production stages.
• There’s no evidence it has a Code of Conduct.
• There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Titania Inglis “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It appears to use leather, wool, and fur.
• Some of its animal-derived materials consist of recycled alternatives to conventional wool.
• It doesn’t appear to use shearling, cashmere, alpaca, mohair, down, angora, or exotic animal skin.
• There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Titania Inglis “Not Good Enough” overall.