GARCIA

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: Netherlands

GARCIA is not taking adequate steps to eliminate hazardous chemicals in its supply chain.

GARCIA sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


GARCIA is owned by J.O.G. Group.


Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate GARCIA “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses some lower-impact materials, however it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of materials used.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking actions to protect biodiversity in its supply chain.
  • It uses renewable energy in its direct operations (such as stores or offices) but not in its supply chain.
  • There’s no evidence it’s set a target to manage water use in its supply chain.


Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate GARCIA “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:


Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate GARCIA “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It appears to use leather, wool, and alpaca.
  • It doesn’t appear to use shearling, cashmere, mohair, down, or exotic animal skin.
  • It has a formal policy but it is not aligned with the Five Domains of Animal Welfare.
  • There’s no evidence it traces any animal-derived materials to the first production stage.


Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate GARCIA “Not Good Enough” overall.

Last updated 2025-09-16