Pepe Jeans

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: Spain

Pepe Jeans sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Pepe Jeans is owned by AWWG.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Pepe Jeans “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses some lower-impact materials, however it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of materials used.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taken any action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in its supply chain.
  • It’s eliminated some hazardous chemicals but has not made a commitment to eliminate all hazardous chemicals in manufacturing.
  • It uses Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certified packaging.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking actions to protect biodiversity in its supply chain.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Pepe Jeans “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Pepe Jeans “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It appears to use leather, wool, cashmere, alpaca, and other animal products.
  • It doesn’t appear to use shearling, mohair, or down.
  • It has a policy to source wool from non-mulesed sheep but doesn’t provide any evidence to verify its claims.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Pepe Jeans “Not Good Enough” overall.

Last updated 2026-01-15