Ray-Ban

Rated: Not good enough

price: $$$$

location: Italy

Ray-Ban is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

Ray-Ban sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Ray-Ban is owned by EssilorLuxottica.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and Wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Ray-Ban “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • There’s no evidence it uses any lower-impact materials.
  • There’s no evidence it’s set a target to manage water use in its Supply Chain.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals in manufacturing.
  • It’s set an absolute target to reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions in its direct operations but not its supply chain.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Ray-Ban “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • More than half of its final production stage is certified by Business Social Compliance Initiative Code of Conduct - BSCI.
  • There’s no evidence it supports diversity and inclusion in its supply chain.
  • It has an internal grievance mechanism for workers to report concerns like harassment and unpaid wages but the process isn’t anonymous.
  • There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.
  • During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, it did not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect workers in its supply chain from the virus.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Ray-Ban “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.
  • It appears to use leather.
  • It doesn’t appear to use wool, down, fur, angora, exotic animal skin, or exotic animal hair.
  • There’s no evidence it traces any animal-derived materials to the first production stage.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Ray-Ban “Not Good Enough” overall.

Last updated February 2023