Rossignol

Rated: We avoid

price: $$$$

location: France

Rossignol is not taking adequate steps to eliminate hazardous chemicals in its supply chain.

Rossignol sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

1 out of 5

Animals

3 out of 5

Overall rating: We avoid

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Rossignol is owned by Groupe Rossignol.

Its environment rating is 'not good enough'. It uses some eco-friendly materials including recycled materials. There is no evidence it reduces its carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions from its supply chain. There is no evidence it has taken meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals. There is no evidence it has a policy to protect biodiversity in its supply chain.

Its labour rating is 'very poor'. There is no evidence it has worker empowerment initiatives such as collective bargaining or rights to make a complaint. There is no evidence it implements practices to support diversity and inclusion in its supply chain. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. It traces some of its supply chain. There is no evidence it audits its supply chain. It does not disclose any policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.

Its animal rating is 'it's a start''. It has a general statement about minimising animal suffering but not a formal animal welfare policy. It uses leather, down and exotic animal hair. It states that it sources wool from non-mulesed sheep. It does not use fur, angora or exotic animal skin. It traces some animal product to the first stage of production.

Rossignol is rated 'We avoid' overall.

Last updated July 2022