UNDERSON UNDERSON

Rated: We avoid

price:
$$$$

location: Japan

UNDERSON UNDERSON is not taking adequate steps to eliminate hazardous chemicals in its supply chain.

UNDERSON UNDERSON sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

1 out of 5

Animals

Not applicable

Overall rating: We avoid

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


UNDERSON UNDERSON is owned by MASH Group.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate UNDERSON UNDERSON “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses few lower-impact materials.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce water use.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking actions to protect biodiversity in its supply chain.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals in manufacturing.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Unfortunately, UNDERSON UNDERSON does not publish sufficient information. You have a right to know how the products you buy affect the issues you care about.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Since UNDERSON UNDERSON makes products that are generally free of animal-derived materials, we’ve not rated its impact on animals. Its overall rating is based on its combined environment and labour scores.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate UNDERSON UNDERSON “We Avoid” overall.

Last updated July 2023