Image credit: Bik Bok

Bik Bok

Rated: Not good enough

price: $$$$

location: Norway

Bik Bok is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

Bik Bok sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

4 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Bik Bok is owned by Varner-Gruppen.

Its environment rating is 'not good enough'. It uses some eco-friendly materials including organic cotton. There is no evidence it has set a greenhouse gas emissions reduction target. There is no evidence it has a policy to protect biodiversity in its supply chain. There is no evidence it minimises textile waste when manufacturing its products.

Its labour rating is 'not good enough'. Little of its supply chain is certified by labour standards which ensure worker health and safety, living wages or other labour rights. It received a score of 41-50% in the 2021 Fashion Transparency Index. There is no evidence it implements practices to support diversity and inclusion in its supply chain. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. It does not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.

Its animal rating is 'good'. It does not use fur, leather, down, exotic animal skin or angora. It states that it sources wool from non-mulesed sheep. It uses exotic animal hair.

Bik Bok is rated 'Not good enough' overall.

Last updated July 2022