Image credit: FILMUS13

FILMUS13

Rated: Good

price:
$$$$

location: Japan

FILMUS13 sustainability rating

Planet

4 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

4 out of 5

Overall rating: Good

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate FILMUS13 “Good”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses a medium proportion of lower-impact materials including organic cotton.
  • It uses lower-impact materials that help limit the chemicals, water, and wastewater in its supply chain.
  • It follows a slow fashion model such as limited production runs and seasonless products.
  • It provides evidence on its efforts to minimise packaging.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate FILMUS13 “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • Some of its second stage is located in low risk countries or certified facilities, however it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of suppliers.
  • The brand claims to audit some of its supply chain but doesn’t specify what percentage.
  • Its Code of Conduct covers some ILO principles.
  • There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate FILMUS13 “Good”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It doesn’t appear to use leather, shearling, wool, cashmere, alpaca, mohair, fur, angora, exotic animal skin, or down.
  • It uses materials derived from waste milk.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate FILMUS13 “Good” overall.

Last updated 2025-10-03