Chopard
Rated: Not good enough
Last rated: Jun 2022
price:location: Switzerland
Chopard is not taking adequate steps to manage water use in its supply chain
Chopard sustainability rating
Suggest a rating update
Planet
People
Animals
Overall rating: Not good enough
Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate
Chopard's environment rating is 'not good enough'. It uses few eco-friendly materials. It manufactures locally to reduce its carbon footprint. There is no evidence it has taken meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals. There is no evidence it implements water reduction initiatives.
Its labour rating is 'not good enough'. Its final stage of production is undertaken in Germany and Switzerland, low risk countries for labour abuse. There is no evidence it has worker empowerment initiatives such as collective bargaining. It traces most of its supply chain including all of the final and second stages of production. It audits its supply chain but does not specify what percentage. It does not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.
Its animal rating is 'not good enough'. There is no evidence it has a policy to minimise the suffering of animals. It uses leather, wool, exotic animal skin, exotic animal hair and silk. It does not use fur, down or angora.
Chopard is rated 'Not good enough' overall.
Rated Jun 2022
Brands often evolve their sustainability practices and disclosures. This rating is based on publicly available information at the time of rating.
