Copenhagen Studios

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: Germany

Copenhagen Studios is not taking adequate steps to manage its greenhouse gas emissions.

Copenhagen Studios sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

3 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Copenhagen Studios is owned by s.Oliver Group.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Copenhagen Studios “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses few lower-impact materials, and it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of materials used.
  • There’s no evidence it’s set a target to manage water use in its supply chain.
  • There’s no evidence it avoids harmful chemicals in the leather tanning process.
  • It’s set a science based target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in both its direct operations and supply chain but there’s no evidence it is on track.
  • To minimise waste, it reuses some of its textile offcuts.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Copenhagen Studios “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • Much of its final stage is located in low risk countries or certified facilities, however it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of suppliers.
  • There’s no evidence it provides financial security to its suppliers, which can result in poor working conditions and wages.
  • It has a basic policy to support diversity and inclusion in its direct operations and supply chain.
  • Its Code of Conduct covers ILO principles.
  • It has an external grievance mechanism for workers in its supply chain to anonymously report concerns like harassment and unpaid wages.
  • There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.
  • During the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, it did not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect workers in its supply chain from the virus.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Copenhagen Studios “It's a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It has a formal policy but it is not aligned with the Five Domains of Animal Welfare.
  • It appears to use leather, wool, cashmere, and alpaca.
  • Some of its animal-derived materials consist of recycled or certified alternatives to conventional cashmere.
  • It doesn’t appear to use shearling, mohair, or down.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Copenhagen Studios “Not Good Enough” overall.

Last updated 2025-07-29