EHE

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: China

EHE sustainability rating

Planet

1 out of 5

People

1 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Here's the rating summary for EHE, following the established format:

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate EHE “Very Poor”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses few lower-impact materials.
  • There’s no evidence it takes action to minimise its packaging, which is a driver of plastic waste.
  • It uses low-impact non-toxic dyes in some of its products.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking actions to protect biodiversity in its supply chain.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assesses brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Unfortunately, EHE does not publish sufficient information. You have a right to know how the products you buy affect the issues you care about.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate EHE “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.
  • It appears to use leather, wool, down, and exotic animal hair.
  • It doesn’t appear to use angora, fur, or exotic animal skin.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate EHE “Not Good Enough” overall.

Last updated 2025-05-15