Furla

Rated: Not good enough

Last rated: Oct 2026

price:
$$$$

location: Italy

Furla is not taking adequate steps to eliminate hazardous chemicals in its supply chain.

Furla sustainability rating

Last rated Oct 2026

Planet

1 out of 5

People

1 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Furla “Very Poor”. Unfortunately, Furla does not publish sufficient information on the most critical planet issues. You have a right to know how the products you buy affect the issues you care about.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Furla “Very Poor”. Unfortunately, Furla does not publish sufficient information on the most critical labour issues. You have a right to know how the products you buy affect the issues you care about.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Furla “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It appears to use leather and wool.
  • It doesn’t appear to use shearling, cashmere, alpaca, mohair, or down.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Furla “Not Good Enough” overall.

Rated Oct 2026

Brands often evolve their sustainability practices and disclosures. This rating is based on publicly available information at the time of rating.