John Richmond

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Unfortunately, John Richmond does not publish sufficient information. You have a right to know how the products you buy affect the issues you care about.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate John Richmond “Very Poor”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• There’s no evidence it audits its suppliers.
• There’s no evidence it has a Code of Conduct.
• It partly traces its final production stage, though not its entire supply chain.
• There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate John Richmond “Very Poor”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.
• It appears to use leather, wool, down, fur, shearling, exotic animal hair, and silk.
• It doesn’t appear to use angora, or exotic animal skin.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate John Richmond “We Avoid” overall.