Johnston & Murphy

Rated: We avoid

price:
$$$$

location: United States

Johnston & Murphy sustainability rating

Planet

0 out of 5

People

0 out of 5

Animals

0 out of 5

Overall rating: We avoid

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Johnston & Murphy is owned by Genesco.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Johnston & Murphy “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses few lower-impact materials, and it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of materials used.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking actions to protect biodiversity in its supply chain.
  • It uses tanneries that are Leather Working Group Gold certified.
  • There's no evidence it has set a greenhouse gas emissions reduction target.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Johnston & Murphy “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It sources its final stage of production from countries with high risk of labour abuse.
  • There’s no evidence it provides financial security to its suppliers, which can result in poor working conditions and wages.
  • There’s no evidence it supports diversity and inclusion in its supply chain.
  • Its Code of Conduct covers ILO principles.
  • The brand claims to audit some of its supply chain but doesn’t specify what percentage.
  • There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.
  • During the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, it did not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect workers in its supply chain from the virus.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Johnston & Murphy “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It appears to use leather.
  • It doesn’t appear to use shearling, wool, cashmere, alpaca, mohair, or down.
  • There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Johnston & Murphy “We Avoid” overall.

Last updated 2025-09-21