Marc O'Polo

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Marc O'Polo “Good”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It uses a high proportion of lower-impact materials including organic cotton.
• It uses low impact materials that help limit the chemicals, water, and wastewater in its supply chain.
• It trains its designers to improve the circularity of its products.
• There’s no evidence it has set a greenhouse gas emissions reduction target.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Marc O'Polo “It’s a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• More than half its final production stage is certified by [BSCI], [SMETA], [SA8000] and [FWF].
• It audits some of its supply chain including all of the final production stage.
• There’s no evidence it supports diversity and inclusion in its supply chain.
• There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.
• During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, it disclosed some policies to protect workers in its supply chain from the virus.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Marc O'Polo “Good”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It has an animal welfare policy aligned with the [Five Domains].
• It appears to use leather, and exotic animal hair.
• It uses recycled wool in some of its wool products.
• [RDS] certifies the down it uses.
• It doesn’t appear to use fur, angora, or exotic animal skin.
• It uses few animal-derived materials.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Marc O'Polo “Good” overall.