Nina Ricci

Rated: Not good enough

price: $$$$

location: France

Nina Ricci is not taking adequate steps to eliminate hazardous chemicals in its supply chain.

Nina Ricci sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Nina Ricci is owned by Puig.

Its environment rating is 'not good enough'. It does not use eco-friendly materials. There is no evidence it minimises textile waste. It has set a science-based target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions generated from its own operations and supply chain but there is no evidence it is on track to meet its target. There is no evidence it has taken meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals.

Its labour rating is 'not good enough'. It has a Code of Conduct that covers some of the ILO Four Fundamental Freedoms principles. There is no evidence it implements practices to encourage diversity and inclusion in its direct operations or supply chain. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. It audits some of its supply chain but does not state what percentage. It does not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.

Its animal rating is 'not good enough'. There is no evidence it has a policy to minimise the suffering of animals. It uses leather, wool and exotic animal hair. It does not use angora, down, exotic animal skin or fur. There is no evidence it traces any animal products to the first stage of production.

Nina Ricci is rated 'Not good enough' overall.

Last updated June 2022