Pandora

Rated: Not good enough

price: $$$$

location: Denmark

Pandora is not taking adequate steps to empower workers in its supply chain.

Pandora sustainability rating

Planet

3 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Pandora's environment rating is 'it's a start'. It uses a medium proportion of eco-friendly materials including recycled materials. There is no evidence it has a policy to prevent deforestation in the supply chain. It reuses some of its waste when manufacturing its products. There is no evidence it has set a greenhouse gas emissions reduction target.

Its labour rating is 'not good enough'. There is no evidence it has worker empowerment initiatives such as collective bargaining or rights to make a complaint. It has a Code of Conduct that covers all of the ILO Four Fundamental Freedoms principles. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. It audits some of its supply chain including all of the final stage of production.

Its animal rating is 'not good enough'. There is no evidence it has a policy to minimise the suffering of animals. It uses leather. It does not use fur, wool, down, angora, exotic animal skin or exotic animal hair. There is no evidence it traces any animal product to the first stage of production.

Pandora is rated 'Not good enough' overall.

Last updated September 2020