Image credit: Patou

Patou

Rated: It's a start

price:
$$$$

location: France

Patou uses lower-impact materials but is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

Patou sustainability rating

Planet

4 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

3 out of 5

Overall rating: It's a start

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Patou is owned by LVMH.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Patou “Good”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses a medium proportion of lower-impact materials including organic cotton.
  • It’s set a science based target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in both its direct operations and supply chain but there’s no evidence it is on track.
  • It’s published a biodiversity protection policy that applies to its entire supply chain.
  • It produces long-lasting products.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Patou “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • Little of its supply chain is certified by labour standards which ensure worker health and safety, living wages or other labour rights.
  • It received a score of 21-30% in the 2022 Fashion Transparency Index.
  • It has a basic policy to support diversity and inclusion in its direct operations and supply chain.
  • There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.
  • During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, it did not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect workers in its supply chain from the virus.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Patou “It’s a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It has a formal policy aligned with the Five Freedoms of animal welfare but few clear implementation mechanisms in place.
  • It appears to use exotic animal hair and decorative feather.
  • It uses recycled wool in some of its wool products.
  • It uses some recycled leather in its leather products.
  • It doesn’t appear to use down, fur, angora, or exotic animal skin.
  • It traces some animal-derived materials to the first production stage.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Patou “It’s a Start” overall.

Last updated June 2023