ro.sham.bo eyewear

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate ro.sham.bo eyewear “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It uses some lower-impact materials including recycled materials. 
• To minimise waste, it recycles some of its textile offcuts.
• There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce its climate impacts.
• There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals in manufacturing.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assesses brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate ro.sham.bo eyewear “Good”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• Its final stage of production is undertaken in Italy, a medium risk country for labour abuse.
• It traces most of its supply chain.
• It audits some of its supply chain including all of the final production stage.
• There is no evidence it has a Code of Conduct.
• There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate ro.sham.bo eyewear “It’s a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.
• It appears to use leather.
• It doesn’t appear to use shearling, wool, cashmere, alpaca, mohair, or down.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate ro.sham.bo eyewear “It's a Start” overall.