Image credit: Stefanel

Stefanel

Rated: It's a start

price:
$$$$

location: Italy

Stefanel has good policies to monitor its suppliers but is not taking adequate steps to reduce textile waste in its supply chain.

Stefanel sustainability rating

Planet

3 out of 5

People

4 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: It's a start

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Stefanel is owned by OVS S.p.A.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Stefanel “It’s a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses few lower-impact materials.
  • There’s no evidence it minimises textile waste in its supply chain.
  • It’s set a science based target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in both its direct operations and supply chain, and it claims it’s on track.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking actions to minimise microplastic impacts.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Stefanel “Good”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • Little of its supply chain is certified by crucial labour standards that help ensure worker health and safety, living wages, and other rights.
  • It received a score of 81-90% in the 2023 Fashion Transparency Index.
  • There’s no evidence it implements practices to support diversity and inclusion in its supply chain.
  • It claims it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain but doesn't define a living wage.
  • During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, it disclosed some policies to protect suppliers from the virus but not workers in its supply chain.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Stefanel “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It’s published a general statement about minimising animal suffering but not a formal animal welfare policy.
  • It appears to use leather, exotic animal hair, and silk.
  • It uses recycled wool in some of its wool products.
  • It doesn’t appear to use down, fur, angora, or exotic animal skin.
  • There’s no evidence it traces any animal-derived materials to the first production stage.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Stefanel “It’s a Start” overall.

Last updated August 2023