Tiger of Sweden

Rated: Not good enough

price: $$$$

location: Sweden

Tiger of Sweden is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

Tiger of Sweden sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Tiger of Sweden is owned by IC Group.

Its environment rating is 'not good enough'. It uses some eco-friendly materials including recycled materials. There is no evidence it reduces its carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions in its supply chain. There is no evidence it implements water reduction initiatives. It complies with its own Restricted Substances List but there is no evidence that it has taken meaningful action to eliminate hazardous chemicals

Its labour rating is 'not good enough'. It has a Code of Conduct that cover all of the Business Social Compliance Initiative Code of Conduct - BSCI principles. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. There is no evidence it has worker empowerment initiatives such as collective bargaining or rights to make a complaint. It audits some of its supply including most of the final stage of production. It does not disclose any policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.

Its animal rating is 'not good enough'. It has a formal animal welfare policy aligned with Five Freedoms. It uses leather, exotic animal hair and wool. It uses down accredited by the Responsible Down Standard. It does not use fur, angora, exotic animal skin. It traces some of animal products to the first stage of production.

Tiger of Sweden is rated 'Not good enough' overall.

Last updated June 2021