WITH SENSE
Rated: Not good enough
price:location: Japan
WITH SENSE does not communicate sufficient information about its environmental and labour policies.
WITH SENSE sustainability rating
Planet
People
Animals
Overall rating: Not good enough
Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate
Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Unfortunately, WITH SENSE does not publish sufficient information. You have a right to know how the products you buy affect the issues you care about.
Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate WITH SENSE “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:
- It partly traces its final production stage, though not its entire supply chain.
- There’s no evidence it has a Code of Conduct.
- The brand claims to audit some of its supply chain but doesn’t specify what percentage.
- There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.
Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate WITH SENSE “Good”. It doesn’t appear to use animal-derived materials but doesn’t claim to be a vegan brand.
Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate WITH SENSE “Not Good Enough” overall.
