CAMP DAVID

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: Germany

CAMP DAVID sustainability rating

Planet

1 out of 5

People

1 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


CAMP DAVID is owned by Clinton Großhandels-GmbH.


Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate CAMP DAVID “Very Poor”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • There’s no evidence it uses any lower-impact materials.
  • It uses renewable energy in its direct operations (such as stores or offices) but not in its supply chain.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals in manufacturing.
  • There’s no evidence it’s set a target to manage water use in its supply chain.


Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate CAMP DAVID “Very Poor”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It partly traces its supply chain including the final and some of the second production stages.
  • There’s no evidence it provides financial security to its suppliers, which can result in poor working conditions and wages.
  • It claims it has a Code of Conduct but does not publicly disclose it.
  • There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.
  • During the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, it did not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect workers in its supply chain from the virus.


Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate CAMP DAVID “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It appears to use leather and down.
  • It doesn’t appear to use shearling, wool, cashmere, alpaca, mohair, exotic animal hair or exotic animal skin
  • It’s published a general statement about minimising animal suffering but not a formal animal welfare policy.


Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate CAMP DAVID “Not Good Enough” overall.

Last updated 2025-09-08