ETERNA

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: Germany

ETERNA is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

ETERNA sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate ETERNA “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses few lower-impact materials, and it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of materials used.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce water use.
  • It uses renewable energy in its direct operations (such as stores or offices) but not in its supply chain.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking actions to protect biodiversity in its supply chain.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate ETERNA “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • Much of its final stage is located in low risk countries or certified facilities, however it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of suppliers.
  • There’s no evidence it provides financial security to its suppliers, which can result in poor working conditions and wages.
  • There’s no evidence it supports diversity and inclusion in its supply chain.
  • It has an internal grievance mechanism for workers in its supply chain to anonymously report concerns like harassment and unpaid wages.
  • There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.
  • During the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, it did not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect workers in its supply chain from the virus.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate ETERNA “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It appears to use wool, cashmere, alpaca, and mohair.
  • It doesn’t appear to use leather, shearling, or down.
  • There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate ETERNA “Not Good Enough” overall.

Last updated 2025-09-23