FCUK

Rated: Not good enough

Last rated: Jun 2021

price:
$$$$

location: United States

FCUK is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

FCUK sustainability rating

This brand was last rated June 2021. The assessment is likely outdated.
Suggest a rating update

Planet

1 out of 5

People

1 out of 5

Animals

3 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


FCUK's environment rating is 'very poor'. It uses few eco-friendly materials. There is no evidence it minimises textile waste. There is no evidence it reduces its carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions in its supply chain. There is no evidence it has taken meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals.

Its labour rating is 'very poor'. There is no evidence it has worker empowerment initiatives such as collective bargaining or rights to make a complaint. It sources its final stage of production from countries with extreme risk of labour abuse. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. It audits some of its supply chain but does not specify what percentage. It does not disclose any policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.

Its animal rating is it's a start. There is no evidence it has a policy to minimise the suffering of animals. It uses leather, exotic animal hair and wool. It does not use fur, down, angora, or exotic animal skin. There is no evidence it traces any animal product to the first stage of production.

FCUK is rated 'not good enough' overall.

Rated Jun 2021

Brands often evolve their sustainability practices and disclosures. This rating is based on publicly available information at the time of rating.