Hudson Jeans
Rated: Not good enough
Last rated: Feb 2022
price:location: United States
Hudson Jeans is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.
Hudson Jeans sustainability rating
Suggest a rating update
Planet
People
Animals
Overall rating: Not good enough
Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate
Hudson Jeans is owned by Centric Brands.
Its environment rating is 'very poor'. It uses few eco-friendly materials. There is no evidence it reduces its carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions in its supply chain. There is no evidence it has taken meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals. There is no evidence it minimises textile waste.
Its labour rating is 'not good enough'. It has a Code of Conduct that covers some of the ILO Four Fundamental Freedoms principles. It traces some of its supply chain. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. There is no evidence it has worker empowerment initiatives such as collective bargaining or rights to make a complaint. It does not disclose any policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.
Its animal rating is it's a start. There is no evidence it has a policy to minimise the suffering of animals. It uses leather and wool. It does not use down, fur, exotic animal skin or exotic animal hair. There is no evidence it traces any animal product to the first stage of production.
Hudson Jeans is rated 'not good enough' overall.
Rated Feb 2022
Brands often evolve their sustainability practices and disclosures. This rating is based on publicly available information at the time of rating.
