Jimmy Choo uses fur and exotic animal hair
Jimmy Choo's environment rating is 'not good enough'. There is no evidence it minimises textile waste. There is no evidence it avoids hazardous chemicals in its supply chain. It measures its greenhouse gas emissions for its direct operations and supply chain but it has not set a greenhouse gas emissions reduction target. There is no evidence of a current water target or goal.
Its labour rating is 'not good enough'. It has a Code of Conduct that covers all of the ILO principles. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. Its final stage of production is undertaken in the European Union, a low/medium risk region for labour rights. It does not publicly list names of any of its suppliers. It does not specify if it uses unannounced audits.
Its animal rating is 'not good enough'. It uses fur, angora, shearling, leather, wool and exotic animal hair. It does not use down or exotic animal skin.
Jimmy Choo is rated 'Not good enough' based on information from our own research.
Last Updated: January 2019