KENZO

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: France

KENZO is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

KENZO sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


KENZO is owned by LVMH.

Its environment rating is 'not good enough'. It uses few eco-friendly materials. There is no evidence it minimises textile waste. It has set an intensity target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions generated from its supply chain target but there is no evidence it is on track to meet it target. It complies with its own Restricted Substances List but there is no evidence it has taken meaningful action to eliminate hazardous chemicals.

Its labour rating is 'not good enough'. Little of its supply chain is certified by labour standards which ensure worker health and safety, living wages or other labour rights. It received a score of 21-30% in the 2021 Fashion Transparency Index. There is no evidence it implements practices to support diversity and inclusion in its supply chain. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. t discloses inadequate policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.

Its animal rating is 'not good enough'. It has a basic formal policy to protect animal welfare. It uses leather, wool, down and exotic animal hair. It does not use angora, exotic animal skin or fur. It traces some animal products to the first stage of production.

KENZO is rated 'Not good enough' overall.

Last updated February 2022