Louis Vuitton is owned by LVMH.
Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Louis Vuitton “It’s a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:
- It uses some lower-impact materials including recycled materials.
- It’s published a biodiversity protection policy that applies to its entire supply chain.
- It’s set a science based target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in both its direct operations and supply chain, and it claims it’s on track.
- It claims to use Leather Working Group certified tanneries but doesn’t specify details about its certification.
Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Louis Vuitton “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:
- Its final production stage happens in the European Union and the USA, medium risk regions and countries for labour abuse.
- There’s no evidence it provides financial security to its suppliers, which can result in poor working conditions and wages.
- There’s no evidence it supports diversity and inclusion in its supply chain.
- Its Code of Conduct covers ILO Four Fundamental Freedoms principles.
- It has an internal grievance mechanism for workers in its supply chain to anonymously report concerns like harassment and unpaid wages.
- There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.
- During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, it did not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect workers in its supply chain from the virus.
Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Louis Vuitton “Very Poor”. These are a few factors influencing its score:
- It has a formal policy aligned with the Five Freedoms of animal welfare but no clear implementation mechanisms in place.
- It appears to use leather, wool, fur, exotic animal skin, and exotic animal hair.
- Responsible Down Standard certifies some of the down it uses.
- It doesn't appear to use angora.
- It traces some animal-derived materials to the first production stage.
Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Louis Vuitton “Not Good Enough” overall.