Nanushka

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Nanushka “It's a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It uses some lower-impact materials including recycled materials.
• It uses low-impact dyes in some of its products.
• There’s no evidence it implements water reduction initiatives in most of its supply chain.
• It offers a rental and resale scheme.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Nanushka “Good”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It traces most of its supply chain.
• Its Code of Conduct covers ILO principles.
• Its unclear whether it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.
• It audits its suppliers.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Nanushka “It's a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It has an animal welfare policy aligned but is not aligned with the Five Domains.
• It appears to use leather, exotic animal hair, and wool.
• It doesn’t appear to use down, fur, angora, or exotic animal skin.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Nanushka “It's a Start” overall.