Outdoor Voices

Rated: Not good enough

Last rated: May 2022

price:
$$$$

location: United States

Outdoor Voices does not communicate sufficient information about its labor policies.

Outdoor Voices sustainability rating

This brand was last rated May 2022. The assessment is likely outdated.
Suggest a rating update

Planet

2 out of 5

People

1 out of 5

Animals

4 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Outdoor Voices environment rating is 'not good enough'. It uses some eco-friendly materials including recycled polyester. There is no evidence it reduces its carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions. There is no evidence that it minimises textile waste. There is no evidence it implements water reduction initiatives.

Its labour rating is 'very poor'. It does not publish sufficient relevant information about its labour policies to give a higher rating. As a shopper you have the right to know how its products impact on its workers.

Its animal rating is 'good'. There is no evidence it has a policy to minimise the suffering of animals. It does not use leather, fur, angora, or exotic animal skin or hair. It uses wool. There is no evidence it traces any animal products to the first stage of production.

Outdoor Voices is rated 'not good enough' overall.

Rated May 2022

Brands often evolve their sustainability practices and disclosures. This rating is based on publicly available information at the time of rating.