RAW MODA

Rated: Not good enough

Last rated: Aug 2025

price:
$$$$

location: Italy

RAW MODA sustainability rating

Last rated Aug 2025

Planet

2 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

4 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate RAW MODA “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:


  • It uses some lower-impact materials; however, it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of materials used.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce its climate impacts.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals in manufacturing.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce water use. 


Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assesses brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate RAW MODA “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It partly traces its supply chain, including all of the final production stage
  • There’s no evidence it has a Code of Conduct.
  • There’s no evidence it audits its suppliers.
  • There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.


Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate RAW MODA “Good”. It doesn’t appear to use animal-derived materials, but doesn’t claim to be a vegan brand.


Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate RAW MODA “Not Good Enough” overall.

Rated Aug 2025

Brands often evolve their sustainability practices and disclosures. This rating is based on publicly available information at the time of rating.