Recman

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Recman “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• There’s no evidence it uses any lower-impact materials.

• While it offers a rental scheme, there’s no evidence it’s taking further action to minimise textile waste in its supply chain.

• There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce its climate impacts.

• There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals in manufacturing.

• There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce water use.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Recman “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It doesn't disclose where all of its final production stage occurs.

• There's no evidence it audits its suppliers.

• It traces some of its supply chain.

• There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Recman “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It appears to use leather and wool.

• It doesn’t appear to use down, fur, angora, exotic animal hair or exotic animal skin.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Recman “Not Good Enough” overall.