Senreve

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Senreve “Good”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It uses few lower-impact materials.
• To minimise waste, it reuses some of its textile offcuts.
• It claims to use Leather Working Group certified tanneries but doesn’t specify details about its certification.
• It produces long-lasting products.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Senreve “It’s a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• Most of its final production stage happens in ltaly, a medium risk country for labour abuse.
• There’s no evidence it has a Code of Conduct.
• There's no evidence it audits its suppliers.
• There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Senreve “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.
• It appears to use leather, shearling, exotic animal hair, and silk.
• It doesn’t appear to use wool, down, fur, angora, or exotic animal skin.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Senreve “It’s a Start” overall.