TOMORROWLAND

Rated: We avoid

price:
$$$$

location: Japan

TOMORROWLAND is not taking adequate steps to eliminate hazardous chemicals in its supply chain.

TOMORROWLAND sustainability rating

Planet

1 out of 5

People

1 out of 5

Animals

1 out of 5

Overall rating: We avoid

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate TOMORROWLAND “Very Poor”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses few lower-impact materials.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking actions to protect biodiversity in its supply chain.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals in manufacturing.
  • There’s no evidence it takes action to minimise its packaging, which is a driver of plastic waste.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Unfortunately, TOMORROWLAND does not publish sufficient information. You have a right to know how the products you buy affect the issues you care about.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate TOMORROWLAND “Very Poor”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.
  • It appears to use down, fur, angora, shearling, exotic animal hair, and silk.
  • It uses some recycled leather in its leather products.
  • Responsible Wool Standard certifies some of the wool it sources.
  • It doesn’t appear to use exotic animal skin.
  • It traces some animal-derived materials to the first production stage.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate TOMORROWLAND “We Avoid” overall.

Last updated February 2024