White House Black Market

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: United States

White House Black Market is not taking adequate steps to manage its greenhouse gas emissions.

White House Black Market sustainability rating

Planet

1 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

3 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


White House Black Market is owned by Chico's FAS.

Its environment rating is 'very poor'. It uses few eco-friendly materials. There is no evidence it reduces its carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions in its supply chain. There is no evidence it has taken meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals. There is no evidence it minimises packaging.

Its labour rating is 'not good enough'. There is no evidence it has worker empowerment initiatives such as collective bargaining or rights to make a complaint. It traces some of its supply chain. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. It audits some of its supply chain. It does not disclose policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.

Its animal rating is it's a start. It has a formal animal welfare policy aligned with Five Freedoms but has no clear mechanisms to implement. It uses leather, exotic animal hair and wool. It does not use fur, down, exotic animal skin or angora. There is no evidence it traces any animal product to the first stage of production.

White House Black Market is rated 'not good enough' overall.

Last updated April 2022