CAT Footwear

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: United States

CAT Footwear sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

1 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


CAT Footwear is owned by Wolverine World Wide.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate CAT Footwear “Not Good Enough”. Unfortunately, CAT Footwear does not publish sufficient information on the most critical planet issues. You have a right to know how the products you buy affect the issues you care about.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate CAT Footwear “Very Poor”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It sources its final stage of production from countries with high risk of labour abuse.
  • Its Code of Conduct covers ILO principles.
  • It traces some of its supply chain.
  • There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate CAT Footwear “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It appears to use leather and wool.
  • It doesn’t appear to use shearling, cashmere, alpaca, mohair, or down.
  • It’s published a general statement about minimising animal suffering but not a formal animal welfare policy.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate CAT Footwear “Not Good Enough” overall.

Last updated 2026-03-27