Dotti

Rated: Not good enough

Last rated: Apr 2022

price:
$$$$

location: Australia

Dotti is not taking adequate steps to manage its greenhouse gas emissions.

Dotti sustainability rating

This brand was last rated April 2022. The assessment is likely outdated.
Suggest a rating update

Planet

1 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

4 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Dotti is owned by The Just Group.

Its environment rating is 'very poor'. It uses few eco-friendly materials. There is no evidence it reduces its carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions in its supply chain. There is no evidence it has taken meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals. There is no evidence it minimises textile waste.

Its labour rating is 'not good enough'. There is no evidence it has worker empowerment initiatives such as collective bargaining or rights to make a complaint. It traces some of its supply chain. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. It audits some of its supply chain but does not specify what percentage. It does not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.

Its animal rating is 'good'. There is no evidence it has a policy to minimise the suffering of animals. It does not use fur, leather, down, angora, exotic animal skin or exotic animal hair. It uses wool. There is no evidence it traces any animal product to the first stage of production.

Dotti is rated 'not good enough' overall.

Rated Apr 2022

Brands often evolve their sustainability practices and disclosures. This rating is based on publicly available information at the time of rating.