Everlast
Rated: Not good enough
price:location: United States
Everlast is not taking adequate steps to manage its greenhouse gas emissions.
Everlast sustainability rating
Planet
People
Animals
Overall rating: Not good enough
Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate
Everlast is owned by Frasers Group.
Its environment rating is 'very poor'. It uses few eco-friendly materials. There is no evidence it reduces its carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions in its supply chain. There is no evidence it has taken meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals. There is no evidence it minimises textile waste.
Its labour rating is 'not good enough'. There is no evidence it has worker empowerment initiatives such as collective bargaining or rights to make a complaint. It traces some of its supply chain. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. It audits some of its supply chain but does not specify what percentage. It does not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.
Its animal rating is 'good'. There is no evidence it has a policy to minimise the suffering of animals. It uses leather. It does not use wool, exotic animal hair, fur, down, angora, or exotic animal skin. There is no evidence it traces any animal product to the first stage of production.
Everlast is rated 'not good enough' overall.
