Image credit: GANT

GANT

Rated: It's a start

price:
$$$$

location: United States

GANT is not taking adequate steps to eliminate hazardous chemicals in its supply chain.

GANT sustainability rating

Planet

4 out of 5

People

2 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: It's a start

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


GANT is owned by Maus Frères.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate GANT “Good”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses a some ower-impact materials, and it publishes an aggregate breakdown of materials used.
  • It’s set a science based target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in both its direct operations and supply chain but there’s no evidence it is on track.
  • To minimise waste, it reuses some of its textile offcuts.
  • It's set a target to prevent water pollution in its supply chain..

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate GANT “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It sources its final stage of production from countries with extreme risk of labour abuse.
  • There’s no evidence it provides financial security to its suppliers, which can result in poor working conditions and wages.
  • There’s no evidence it supports diversity and inclusion in its supply chain.
  • Its Code of Conduct covers ILO principles.
  • It audits some of its supply chain including all of the final production stage.
  • There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.
  • It has not taken sufficient steps to remediate its links to cotton sourced from Xinjiang, a region in China at risk of Uyghur forced labour.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate GANT “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It appears to use leather, wool, cashmere, alpaca, mohair, and down.
  • Some of its animal-derived materials consist of recycled or certified alternatives to conventional wool, mohair, and down.
  • It doesn’t appear to use fur, exotic animal skin, or angora.
  • It has an animal welfare policy but it is not aligned with the Five Domains.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate GANT “It's a Start” overall.

Last updated 2025-09-21