GOLDEN GOOSE

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: Italy

GOLDEN GOOSE is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

GOLDEN GOOSE sustainability rating

Planet

3 out of 5

People

3 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


GOLDEN GOOSE is owned by Carlyle Group.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate GOLDEN GOOSE “It's a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It engages with production suppliers to manage water use.
  • It’s set a science based target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in both its direct operations and supply chain but claims it’s not on track.
  • It trains its designers to improve the circularity of its products.
  • There’s no evidence it minimises solvent-based chemicals, which can be harmful to workers and the environment in production.
  • There’s no evidence it’s set a target to manage water use in its supply chain.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate GOLDEN GOOSE “It's a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • Its final production stage happens in medium risk countries for labour abuse, however it doesn't publish an aggregate breakdown of supplier locations.
  • There’s no evidence it provides financial security to its suppliers, which can result in poor working conditions and wages.
  • It has an external grievance mechanism for workers in its supply chain to anonymously report concerns like harassment and unpaid wages.
  • There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.
  • During the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, it did not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect workers in its supply chain from the virus.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate GOLDEN GOOSE “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It appears to use leather, shearling, wool, cashmere, alpaca, and mohair.
  • It doesn’t appear to use down.
  • It has a formal policy but it is not aligned with the Five Domains of Animal Welfare.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate GOLDEN GOOSE “Not Good Enough” overall.

Last updated 2026-07-23