Goldwin

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: Japan

Goldwin is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

Goldwin sustainability rating

Planet

2 out of 5

People

1 out of 5

Animals

3 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Goldwin's environment rating is 'not good enough'. It uses some eco-friendly materials including recycled materials. There is no evidence it has set a greenhouse gas emissions reduction target. There is no evidence it implements water reduction initiatives. There is no evidence it has taken meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals.

Its labour rating is 'very poor'. There is no evidence it has worker empowerment initiatives such as collective bargaining or rights to make a complaint. It sources its final stage of production from countries with extreme risk of labour abuse. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. It does not disclose any policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.

Its animal rating is it's a start. There is no evidence it has a policy to minimise the suffering of animals. It uses leather, wool and down. It does not use exotic animal hair, fur, angora, or exotic animal skin. There is no evidence it traces any animal product to the first stage of production.

Goldwin is rated 'not good enough' overall.

Last updated December 2021