INTERSPORT

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: Switzerland

INTERSPORT is not taking adequate steps to manage its greenhouse gas emissions.

INTERSPORT sustainability rating

Planet

1 out of 5

People

1 out of 5

Animals

2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


INTERSPORT's rating applies to the INTERSPORT house apparel brands only and doesn’t apply to other product categories. Check the individual ratings to learn about the other brands that INTERSPORT stocks.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate INTERSPORT “Very Poor”. Unfortunately, INTERSPORT does not publish sufficient information on the most critical planet issues. You have a right to know how the products you buy affect the issues you care about.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate INTERSPORT “Very Poor”. Unfortunately, INTERSPORT does not publish sufficient information on the most critical labour issues. You have a right to know how the products you buy affect the issues you care about.

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate INTERSPORT “Not Good Enough”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It appears to use leather, wool, and down.
  • It doesn’t appear to use shearling, cashmere, alpaca, mohair, fur, angora, exotic animal hair, or exotic animal skin. 
  • It has a formal policy but it is not aligned with the Five Domains of Animal Welfare.
  • It has a policy to source wool from non-mulesed sheep but doesn’t provide any evidence to verify its claims.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate INTERSPORT “Not Good Enough” overall.

Last updated 2026-10-12