Peloton

Rated: Not good enough

price:
$$$$

location: Australia

Peloton is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

Peloton sustainability rating

Planet

1 out of 5

People

1 out of 5

Animals

4 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Peloton's environment rating is 'very poor'. It uses few eco-friendly materials. There is no evidence it reduces its carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions in its supply chain. There is no evidence it has taken meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals. There is no evidence it minimises textile waste.

Its labour rating is 'very poor'. There is no evidence it has a Code of Conduct. It traces some of its supply chain. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. There is no evidence it has worker empowerment initiatives such as collective bargaining or rights to make a complaint. It does not disclose any policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.

Its animal rating is 'good'. It uses few animal material in its products. There is no evidence it has a policy to minimise the suffering of animals It uses wool and exotic animal hair. It does not use fur, exotic animal skin or exotic animal hair.

Peloton is rated 'not good enough' overall.

Last updated February 2022