Image credit: Arc'teryx

Arc'teryx

Rated: Good

price:
$$$$

location: Canada

Arc'teryx sustainability rating

Planet

3 out of 5

People

4 out of 5

Animals

4 out of 5

Overall rating: Good

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate


Arc'teryx is owned by Amer Sports.

Our “Planet” rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Arc'teryx “It’s a Start”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses some lower-impact materials including recycled materials.
  • It produces long-lasting products.
  • There’s no evidence it takes action to minimise its packaging, which is a driver of plastic waste.
  • It’s set a target to eliminate hazardous chemicals after 2025 but does not disclose whether it is on track.
  • There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce water use.
  • It’s set a science based target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in both its direct operations and supply chain but there’s no evidence it is on track.

Workers’ rights are central to our “People” rating, which assess brands’ policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Arc'teryx “Good”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

Brands’ animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals” rating. Here we rate Arc'teryx “Good”. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It has a formal policy aligned with the Five Freedoms of animal welfare and clear implementation mechanisms in place.
  • It appears to use leather.
  • Responsible Down Standard certifies the down it uses.
  • ZQ Merino and Responsible Wool Standard certifies the wool it uses.
  • It doesn’t appear to use fur, angora, exotic animal hair, or exotic animal skin.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Arc'teryx “Good” overall.

Last updated 2024-12-13