brand cover image


Rated: Not good enough

price: $$$$

location: United States

Saucony is not taking adequate steps to ensure payment of a living wage for its workers.

Saucony sustainability rating


2 out of 5


1 out of 5


2 out of 5

Overall rating: Not good enough

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great) How we rate

Saucony is owned by Wolverine Worldwide.

Its environment rating is 'not good enough'. It uses few eco-friendly materials. It uses tanneries that are certified gold or silver by the Leather Working Group. There is no evidence it reduces its carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions in most of its supply chain. There is no evidence it has a policy to prevent deforestation in the supply chain.

Its labour rating is 'very poor'. None of its supply chain is certified by labour standards which ensure worker health and safety, living wages or other labour rights. It received a score of 1-10% in the 2021 Fashion Transparency Index. There is no evidence it implements practices to support diversity and inclusion in its supply chain. There is no evidence it ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. It does not disclose any policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.

Its animal rating is 'not good enough'. There is no evidence it has an animal welfare policy. It uses leather and wool. It does not use fur, down, angora or exotic animal skin. There is no evidences it traces animal products to the first stage of production.

Saucony is rated 'Not good enough' overall.

Last updated May 2022